In African schools, as you may already be aware, there is
corporal punishment. It's the
cornerstone of school discipline on the whole continent, even
though in Tanzania it's officially banned.
Karibu Tanzania: it's banned, but
the teachers still must follow set rules to administer it.* At government schools there is a job called Discipline
Master, and that is the teacher who regularly administers the punishment. (Although all teachers can do it.) The DM walks around the school assessing
infractions and calls out students, usually after Assembly in the morning. In front of the student body, students are
singled out and hit for being late, for sleeping in class, for cutting up, for
not doing their homework, for cheating on tests. They are beaten for having unpaid school fees
(this seems most unfair,) for having a dirty or incomplete uniform, for leaving
their notebooks out in the rain, for loitering at the toilet too long. As many things as a school child can think of,
or not think of, to do wrong, all are punishable by being hit.
Punishment is administered with a cane made of stiff bamboo,
or other stiff rod.The regulations say boys and girls are
to be hit on the hand. Boys can also be hit on
the bottom, but only through their trousers. Every teacher I have met has a story to tell
about a demonic, cunning, or just plain mean Discipline Master who enjoys
beating the shit out of students. The corollary is, sadly, the story of the
student who somehow becomes the victim of a DM and is regularly beaten for
trumped up infractions. But even the
most conscientious DM is committed to the idea that hitting students is a good
and proper way to ensure their compliance and proper behavior.
At SEGA, a school founded and supported by Americans, corporal
punishment is forbidden. This has led to
some interesting outcomes and discussions.
The veteran teachers say that discipline at SEGA is lax because the
students know they can do anything and not be hit. They don't buy into the idea of corporal punishment
as ineffective - these teachers sincerely feel that at SEGA they are deprived of a useful and regular tool to
manage students. In the staff room, they talk longingly about the need for
better discipline. They say that the
girls consider SEGA a country club, and don't have good school habits, because
we don't hit them. They say that beating
a student is a clear, unequivocal means of punishment, and once it's
administered the slate is clean and the problem is over. Any other form of punishment is just too
fraught with ideas of suitability and efficacy.
Some students seem to believe this, too.
Nobody at school, it seems, can imagine a world with both proper discipline and the absence
of corporal punishment.
Another form of
punishment is cleaning. School cleaning
in Africa is not done by employees, like janitors. It's done by the students. Washing blackboards, sweeping, picking up
trash, mopping, scrubbing latrines, washing up after meals, carrying water, serving lunch
and tea to the teachers, even gardening, trimming grass and bushes, irrigating
with buckets, and creating hardscape (as in, carrying rocks) - all are student
jobs. Students are assigned these jobs
outside of class, before the start bell rings and after school. If they don't do these jobs, they can be
beaten for it, or simply assigned more cleaning as punishment.
At SEGA, we go in for cleaning as punishment in a big
way. I am currently in trouble with the
Matron (supervisor of girls outside of class) because yesterday I refused to
let her take my Form 2 students out of class for yard cleaning during the
middle of an important lesson. I am an
affront to good order, as they were supposed to be punished for not doing the
yard cleaning earlier.
Interestingly, the only thing that is never a consideration
for punishing student misbehavior at SEGA is lowering their grades. Last year,
we encountered a huge cheating ring in Form 2, during a mid-term exam. The punishment? A letter to the parents, and being suspended
from class for a week to do some large projects on the grounds. At no time was giving them an 'F', or even
docking their grades, considered.
There may be a considerable reason for that: In Forms 2 and 4, (9th and 11th grades) the students
don't really get a final mark from the school, they succeed or fail on the
basis of their performance on the National Exam. A student could miss every 3rd day at school, do no homework,
and sleep during class, but if she makes 45 or above on her NECTA, she goes on to the
next level . The students know this, and
the teachers do too. So there is a
tendency to consider grades as separate from discipline, even in the other
forms.
I'm glad I don't have to witness students being beaten. I am sometimes frustrated by the lack of
support given by the school and other teachers to a commitment to a discipline
model without corporal punishment. But
we have lots of policy and procedure issues that need to be worked out. It's not the TZ-way to push through a lot of
decisions and then stick to them. The
path here wanders quite a bit more than that.
And I think about my own discipline, both now and at that
age. I was certainly not a model
student; no goody two-shoes, I. I did things to deadline, for grades, and
because I liked to do them, in that order.
I don't think I would have been different if I had been afraid of being
beaten.
Our girls have done well on their National Exams, and they
don't seem less disciplined than my students at the school where I did my practice
teaching, which had quite an 'active'
DM. Kids this age are irrepressible and
naturally make bad choices. I've come to
believe that if they expect to be hit, it no more changes their behavior than
anything else. Students will avoid being
hit, and being caught in the first place, but some will still be lazy, or
cut-up, or not do their chores. Some are
Tom Sawyer, some are Huckleberry Finn. Consistent
modeling of good behavior by the teachers, consistent reward of good behavior on the part of students, and consistent punishment for known infractions is the answer, but it's not
the solution.
*Karibu Tanzania, lit., "Welcome to Tanzania". A mildly ironic phrase used by PCV's to express some of the interesting and intractable anomalies of life in the country.
Cultural differences are certainly difficult to deal with and there isn't much that you can do to change them overnight. Frustrating, for sure.
ReplyDeleteI'm reading about a Utah school where dozens of students with negative balances in their lunch card accounts literally had their lunch trays taken from them and their lunches thrown away, leaving the students hungry*, embarrassed and humiliated in front of their peers. It appears that both TZ and US school systems need to adopt fair, humane & uniform disciplines.
Deep breaths and a glass of vino tonight!
*The students were given fruit and milk. This did little for their embarrassment and humiliation.